|
-
Brain-machine interfaces (Fagg, Rennaker). Establishing direct connections between
neurons and digital computers provides the possibility for high-bandwidth interaction between
prosthetic limbs and cognitive assistants. One of the key challenges is how to interpret the activity
of many neurons in the context of some task. This project explores a number of representation,
regression, and classification techniques as applied to problems including limb movement (Nemati
et al., 2007; Fagg et al., under review; Fagg et al., 2007) odor encoding and identification (Wilson
et al., 2006; Rennaker et al., 2006, 2007).
- Scientific data mining for computational neuroscience (Lane,
Calhoun). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and
magnetoencepholography (MEG) provide unprecedented, fine-grained,
noninvasive views of the living brain (Kiehl and Liddle, 2001; Clark
et al., 2000, 2001; Ranken et al., 2002). Unfortunately, the data
from these sensors is also extremely high-dimensional, noisy, and
nonlinear (Friston et al., 1995; Buchel and Friston, 1997; George et
al., 2000; Clark, 2002; Friston et al., 2003; Penny et al.,
2004). In this project, we develop and employ
advanced ML methods for analyzing such data. Through Drs. Lane and
Calhoun's existing partnerships with the Mental Illness and
Neuroscience Discovery (MIND) Institute in Albuquerque, NM, we have
access to data from state of the art fMRI and MEG imaging systems
and colleagues with extensive neuroscience expertise. A core
neuroscience question is to elicit the networks of brain activity
underlying a particular behavior or mental illness. Neuroimaging
systems report the activity of individual brain regions, but not the
interactions among them. There is a substantial hidden-state
recovery problem: identify the hidden network behind the observed
regional activities (and correlate those networks with behavior or
illness (Burge et al., 2004; Qiu and Lane, 2005; Burge and Lane,
2005a,b, 2006, 2007; Clark et al., 2007). In this project, REU
students will team with graduate students to do exploratory data
mining of neuroimaging data. They will employ tools developed in
Dr. Lane’s group and state of the art graph inference tools from the
ML community (Chickering et al., 1994; Heckerman, 1995; Getoor et
al., 2001; Leslie et al., 2002; McGovern et al., 2003; Friedman and
Koller, 2003; Domingos and Richardson, 2004; Jensen et al., 2004;
Neville and Jensen, 2004; Wegner et al., 2005; Mahadevan, 2005c,b,a;
Maggioni and Mahadevan, 2006) to identify networks in brain data,
develop statistical confidence measures on the networks, and will
work with neuroscientists to validate the findings.
|